The Attorney-General (A-G) and Minister for Justice, Godfred Yeboah Dame has described recent commentaries regarding high-profile criminal cases pending in court as one that “transgresses permissible limits of free speech,” and unduly interferes with the work of State Prosecutors.
With specific reference to the cases of Republic vs. James Gyakye-Quayson, Republic vs. Dr. Stephen Opuni & 2 Others, and Republic vs. Cassiel Ato Forson and two others, the A-G said the public is cautioned against unwarranted utterances that prejudice the matters.
High-profile personalities including the Dormaahene and President of the Bono Regional House of Chiefs, Osagyefo Oseadeeyo Agyemang Badu II, has appealed to President Akufo-Addo to intervene in the prosecution of the Member of Parliament for Assin North James Gyakye Quayson following his victory in the by-election.
Mr. Quayson is facing criminal charges brought against him after he lost his seat as Member of Parliament for Assin North.
He is accused of allegedly failing to renounce his dual citizenship status before filing to contest the 2020 Parliamentary election.
The outspoken Chief who’s also a sitting High Court Judge known in judicial practice as His Lordship Justice Daniel Mensah made the appeal while speaking on the 10th-anniversary lecture of John Evans Atta Mills in Sunyani.
However, a statement released on Tuesday, July 4, 2023, by the Office of the Attorney General and the Ministry of Justice signed by the AG, Godfred Yeboah Dame cautioned against comments that interfere with administration of justice.
“The Attorney-General finally cautions that no immunity is conferred by a person’s position in Parliament, the Judiciary, Traditional Authority, the Bar, or any official position, from the consequences of an interference in the administration of justice or an attempt to overreach a judgment to be delivered by the court in any matter. We must respect due process,” the AG cautioned.
Below is the full statement from the office of the Attorney General and Minister of Justice
PRESS RELEASE
P. O. Box MB 60, Ministries, Accra Digital Address: GA-110-0587
Kindly quote this number and date on all correspondence
My Ref:
Your Ref: No.
Date. 4th July 2023
RE: UNJUSTIFIED COMMENTARY ABOUT PENDING CRIMINAL AND OTHER CASES AND ATTACKS ON STATE ATTORNEYS
The Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice has observed with serious concern the increased tendency for various persons, including members of the legal profession of considerable standing, to run extremely prejudicial commentary on cases pending before the courts.
The cases which have been the subject of unwarranted public commentary include but are not limited to, Republic vs. James Gyakye-Quayson, Republic vs. Dr. Stephen Opuni & 2 Others, and Republic vs. Cassiel Ato Forson & 2 Others.
Whilst respecting the freedom of all persons in Ghana to comment on any matter including cases pending in court, the Attorney- General and Minister for Justice takes note that much of the recent commentary on many of the so-called high-profile criminal cases transgresses permissible limits of free speech, unduly interferes with the work of State Prosecutors performing their constitutional function of prosecuting crime in Ghana and tends to put unnecessary pressure on the courts.
The Attorney-General respectfully reminds Ghanaians of the principle of the equality of all persons before the law enshrined in Article 17(1) of the Constitution. No person living in Ghana, citizen or non-citizen, is above the laws of Ghana or immune from an application of same.
The Attorney-General’s constitutional responsibility for the “initiation and conduct of all prosecutions of criminal offences” implies a duty to prosecute a crime committed in Ghana, after proper investigations have been conducted, irrespective of the political, race, colour, ethnic, religion, economic or social status of the culprit.
State Attorneys assisting the Attorney-General in the performance of this hallowed constitutional mandate, operate under extreme pressure and are exposed to severe risks. They have the right to prosecute cases freely in a court of law just as private legal practitioners enjoy a right to defend their clients, free from abuse and attacks on their character.
The decision to prefer a charge against an accused person is not made on the basis of a person’s political status, social or economic standing but on the strength of evidence subject to the scrutiny of the courts. An acquittal of a person by the courts does not imply malice on the part of the Republic in the filing of a charge. The perception that a crime committed by a person of high political standing in society should not be prosecuted is dangerous for society and must not be countenanced.
The Office of the Attorney-General and Ministry of Justice observes that many of the recent comments by various persons on some criminal matters, particularly those mentioned above (widely publicised in the media), clearly exceed the bounds of acceptable speech as they seek to disparage prosecutors in the eyes of the public and frustrate prosecution of those cases. Some of the comments are orchestrated to pervert the course of justice and/or prejudice the fair hearing and determination of the cases.
The Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, in the discharge of his duty to protect the administration of justice from abuse, hereby entreats the general public to permit the streams of justice to flow freely and uncontaminated by undue comments and pressure on the courts.
The Attorney-General finally cautions that no immunity is conferred by a person’s position in Parliament, the Judiciary, Traditional Authority, the Bar, or any official position, from the consequences of an interference in the administration of justice or an attempt to overreach a judgment to be delivered by the court in any matter. We must respect due process.
END!!!
SGD
GODFRED YEBOAH DAME THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL &
MINISTER FOR JUSTICE
- High Court in Ho rejects John Peter Amewu's bid to delay ruling on SALL election petition
- Parliament approves Supreme Court justice nominees
- Two lawyers fight over credit for SC striking out of 2 sections of the Companies Act
- €2.37million financial loss case: High Court delivers judgement February next year
- Meet the Quarcoos and Owusus, the two couples called to the Ghana Bar on the same day
- Read all related articles