Breaching the laws to acquire auction cars: The exposure of the Auditor-General against 19 current and former Justices of superior courts
File photo
A regular caller by name John called into GBC Central Morning Show today in Cape Coast, August 31, 2022, and asked the host "DC, are you aware that some Justices have been indicted by the Auditor-General for breaching rules governing the sale of auction cars?"
Read full articleIn bewilderment and not well apprised with the facts of the news, I answered in the negative and he added "I know you like reading so I shall stop here, find out and tomorrow I shall call back to contribute to the matter," he ended.
Though hosting the morning show, I was eager to find out and had to quickly Google to ascertain the veracity of the claim made by the caller.
Lo and behold, I saw this GhanaWeb headline "Top judges paid as low as GH¢7,509 for auction cars - Auditor-General's report" amongst other links popped up. I Clicked on it and read. The caller was right and current than I was.
The lead of the GhanaWeb story has it that, "The Auditor-General has cited 19 past and present judges of Ghana's superior courts for acquiring state vehicles - a move that contravenes Regulations 158 of the Public Financial Management Regulations, 2019 (L.I. 2378)".
"This regulation provides that the Principal Spending Officer of a covered entity shall obtain the prior written approval of the Minister for the transfer, exchange, sale, donation, contribution-in-kind, trust and any other disposal of any vehicles of the covered entity (Ackah-Blah, 2022)"
Portions of Regulation 158 also states that any such disposal, lease and other action referred to in Sub-regulation 1 that is made without the written approval of the Minister, is void.
Thus according to the report “In the absence of approval from the Minister for Finance, we recommended that the auction should be nullified, and the vehicles recovered”.
The difficulty I have is this: how can Justices of the superior courts of Ghana breach financial regulations regarding the purchase of cars? Again, were the cars so cheap that in their haste to enjoy from the state largesse, they forget about the legal processes governing such activities? Or that, they were not involved in any of the processes but were only made to pay for the cars?
Notwithstanding the above, a political science lecturer of the University of Ghana, Dr. Kwame Asah-Asante is of the view that the Judges cannot be faulted for purchasing vehicles unlawfully. “I don’t blame the judges because they will apply, and [because] they want the right things to be done, once you say it’s okay you can buy, they can”. How can he come to such a conclusion when the act itself is unlawful?
We have to look at the policy itself; whether it’s worth maintaining. I think this policy is moribund. It must be jettisoned and thrown into the lake of fire. We don’t need this (Ansah-Asante, 2022)”.
The point to make is, these are men who are at the apex of justice delivery in our motherland, and the rulings of the supreme court if there are no precedents become law as ruled.
If the political science lecturer thinks that judges cannot be blamed but rather the system, couldn't they have done due diligence before making payments for the cars? These are men who retire on their salaries. Some of them have served on the bench for several years. Couldn't they have acquired cars of their own? Or the usual taking advantage of the state is what might have engulfed their minds?
To be fair to my readers, I've provided the full list of all the Judges, the cars bought, and the amounts paid as follows: H/L Thomas Ofedie Toyota Corolla Saloon GM 6826-13 GHC 7,509.00, H/L Justice Asmah K. Asiedu Toyota Corolla Saloon GN 4997-13 GHC 8,399.00, H/W Charles Y. Boateng Toyota Corolla Saloon GM 8311-13 GHC 9,090.00, Robert Cudjoe Toyota Corolla Saloon GM 9231-13 GHC 12,687.00, H/L Justice Jacob B. Boon Toyota Avensis GM 517-15 GHC 13,100.00.
The rest are: H/L Justice N. S. Gbadegbe Toyota Avalon Saloon GR 2777-14 GHC 27,570.90, H/L Justice Julius Ansah Toyota Avalon Saloon GT 2774-14 GHC 40,920.06, H/L Justice Yaw Appau Toyota Avalon saloon GT 2945-14 GHC 48,632.00, H/L Justice Yaw Appau Toyota Land Cruiser 200 (v8) GR 6590-17 GHC 56,606.00, H/L Justice F. G. Korbieh Toyota Land Cruiser GR 8132-17 GHC 57,975.00.
Further, H/L Justice E. K. Mensah Toyota Fortuner-SUV GT 30-18 GHC 59,000.00, H/L Justice Nathaniel Osam Toyota Fortuner SUV GT 49-18 GHC 60,445.00, H/L Justice N. S. Gbadegbe Toyota Land Cruiser GR 4158-17 GHC 67,047.00, H/L Justice Lawrence L Mensah Toyota Land Cruiser GR 1902-17 GHC 67,192.00, H/L Justice Julius Ansah Toyota Land Cruiser GR 4128-17 GHC 75,643.00, H/L Justice Jennifer A Tagoe Toyota Fortuner-SUV GT 75-18 GHC 87,887.00 H/L Barbara W. Acquah Toyota FortunerStation Wagon GN 57-18 GHC 92,914.00, H/L Elizabeth Ankumah Toyota Fortuner-SUV GT 39-18 107 GHC 107,271.00, H/L Justice N. C. Agbevor Toyota Land Cruiser GT 796-19 123 GHC 123,620.00.
In sum, it is very disturbing when our revered men of the bench act in ways that bring their names into disrepute. Whether it was their fault or not, I think that being members of the bench, they ought to have known better and acted within the confines of the law.
Assuming without admitting that, they are not legally liable for any offence. What about the moral aspects too? If no wrong has been committed why would The Auditor-General recommend a nullification of the vehicles purchased and the same recovered?
The report about our Justices purchasing auction cars illegally depicts us as a society whose moral depravity issues has reached alarming proportions and the earlier we look at it the better.
Read full article