Former Pro Vice-Chancellor of the University for Development Studies Professor David Millar stated that President Nana Akufo-Addo has failed to show some leadership qualities he was confident about.
In an interview on Dreamz Fm, he stated that such leadership qualities which include decisiveness, firmness, and integrity were the hallmark of the late father of the President as a leader of the then UNC. He therefore was confident that such leadership traits would have been carried through by the President when he took over the reins of government.
While disclosing that he voted for then candidate Akufo Addo in both the 2016 and 2020 elections with the hope that the qualities of late father of the president would be manifested, the revered Professor Professor and Development Economist said he is still recovering from a disappointment in the President.
“The first voting was with the understanding that the qualities I know of his father and of UNC. When I was a student, I was a member of UNC and that was his father’s party. Those qualities I thought his son could carry forward. Because of relating the father’s qualities with the son, I went voting for him. By the end of the first term, it appeared he had a lot of obligations to honor. So, he spent his first term trying to satisfy all the constituencies that assisted him to come to power, so I said he could have compromised on so many things. I saw the second term as a dedicated term for he himself and to say this is what I’m and this is what I want to do for my country. That’s the reason I voted for him in the second election,” he said in an interview on Dreamz Fm’s State of Our Nation.
Professor Millar who is Founder and President of the Millar University for Transdisciplinary and Development Studies explained that recent happenings where the President makes a public statement and such statements turn to be contravened in implementation by his appointees without any apology is a dent on the leadership of the President.
Professor David Millar was commenting on the ongoing discussions on government’s domestic debt exchange program. In his assertion, the inclusion of individual bondholders like himself is a threat to thousands of retirees and must be reviewed.